Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
In: Judgment and Decision Making, Jg. 17 (2022-03-01), S. 315-330
Online
academicJournal
Zugriff:
When evaluating a charity by itself, people tend to overweight overhead costs in relation to cost-effectiveness. However, when evaluating charities side by side, they base their donations on cost-effectiveness. I conducted a replication and extension of Caviola et al. (2014; Study 1) using a 3 (High Overhead/Effectiveness, Low Overhead/Effectiveness, Both) x 2 (Humans, Animals) between-subjects design. I found that the overhead ratio is an easier attribute to evaluate than cost-effectiveness in separate evaluation, and, in joint evaluation, people allocate donations based on cost-effectiveness. This effect was observed for human charities, and to a lesser extent, for animal charities.
Titel: |
Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Glen William Spiteri |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | Judgment and Decision Making, Jg. 17 (2022-03-01), S. 315-330 |
Veröffentlichung: | Cambridge University Press, 2022 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 1930-2975 (print) |
DOI: | 10.1017/S1930297500009128 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|